More info on Neutron Therapy
In our curative patient population, neutrons provided a
68% local relapse-free survival at 4 years, comparable to
results described in our previous report. Significantly, neutrons
were able to provide this efficacy for patients with the
most worrisome of high-risk features, such as the presence
of contaminated surgical margins or unresectable gross disease.
Standard photon radiotherapy fails locally in up to
70Â80% of such cases.
But at the same time the opinion from my oncologist at Indiana University is that "There is nothing in the world's literature to suggest this has any superiority to standard radiotherapy, in my opinion. This technology has been around for over 20 years and that is why it hasn't been widely endorsed."
Confused yet? I sure am. I am got a list of the top Sarcoma hospitals in the country. I am going to see if I can get an opinion from one their specialists. I also still plan on talking to a doctor from the University of Washington to discuss the benefits/risks of Neutron therapy vs.Conventionall radiotherapy. I have about two - four weeks before I need to begin treatment. I'll keep everyone posted as this goes forward.